
It’s been said that there's no such thing as bad publicity, and in the case of notoriety among books, that may be true. Sex, violence, drugs, profanity, obscenity and any other shocking scenes you can think of, they’ve been written about. And sure enough, someone, somewhere has taken offense, mounted a protest, and unwittingly given the book far more attention than it might have had otherwise. Banned book lists, brown paper wraps, black censor bars and all – the more a book is rumored to be outrageous, the more hype and curiosity is built up around it.
A great example is A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess. The dystopian story of ultra-violent Alex and his dear droogs was first published in 1962 in the UK, and immediately had the British public up in arms. The novel is largely centered around the ideas of free will and nature versus nurture (or how much of our personality and choices are determined inherently rather than learned), but also wholeheartedly embraces the aestheticization of violence – that is the depiction of graphic, over-the-top, excessive violence in a stylized, exaggerated fashion. The story focuses on Alex, an English teenager, and his cronies, or “droogs”, and their day-to-day life in London, which includes opiate-enhanced nights at the milk bar, sprees of orgiastic and unprovoked violent crime, and other unsavory activity. All are willing participants, but Alex is clearly the ringleader and most depraved of the bunch.
Both the novel and its film adaptation (directed by Stanley Kubrick, released in 1972) were met with glee by some readers and audience members, and shocked horror by others. From the immediate wanton, senseless acts of cruelty, to Alex’s betrayal by his droogs, capture and ultimate twisted, excruciating behavior modification rehabilitation, the story is relentless and leaves readers dazed and bruised. Five decades later, students of both film and literature still cite and analyze A Clockwork Orange, and it seems unlikely that the title will ever fade into obscurity. It says something that even all this time later, new readers and viewers will likely still understand the objections raised in 1962 – the violence is horrific even by today’s standards.
That’s not always the case. Outcries and censorship around literature are far from new, and some of the books that were notorious or controversial in their day wouldn’t even have folks batting an eye now. Take Chaucer’s classic tale of a pilgrimage, The Canterbury Tales. Written in Middle English in the 14th century, it is widely considered one of the finest pieces of literature. But it was not without its detractors – the Catholic church, among others, denounced much of the work for its bawdiness, crudeness, and hints at blasphemy. But by today’s standards, it’s a kind of risqué or naughty that we find cute and harmless, especially when compared with something like A Clockwork Orange.
Regardless of one’s personal feelings about a work, there’s no denying that controversy and curiosity go hand in hand. To demonstrate, we’ve put together a selection of some of the most notorious, controversial, objected-to books the literary world has seen. Bet you’ve heard of all or most.
Censored and Banned Books: From John Steinbeck to Dr. Seuss › Play Video
While Fight Club is immensely popular, some readers take issue with the glorification of violence and anarchy, as well as casual treatment of dark subjects such as abortion.
A futuristic, dystopian, anti-feminist state is the backdrop for this novel, whose themes were deemed obscene, blasphemous and anti-Christian by some schools and critics.
While a more successful children's book franchise has never existed, many Christian parents nevertheless railed against Harry Potter, deeming his magical dabblings blasphemous.
Many parents fought schools' inclusion of this tale of a prince choosing to marry another prince instead of a princess, claiming a homosexual agenda and indoctrination.
First published in 1928, the portrayals of a sexual relationship between a lady of the aristocracy and a blue-collar man, as well as inclusion of some then-unprintable four-letter-words appalled many critics and readers.